Search for: "Marts v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Is Delaware law as stated in MacRitchie consistent with Dodge v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
TBL Licensing v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Taylor Jr. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trinity Wall St. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
., et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Introduction: Jeanne Fromer Private actors pursue their own interests. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Even from 20 years ago, it’s a big change—Wal-Mart, Traffix, and Dastar were trying to resolve hard questions and details of doctrine that affect how things work on the ground. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Smotherman, Reading Between the Wines: Granholm v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
Precedential No. 2: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Proposed Multi-Color Mark for Breakfast Cereals
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
Wal-Mart Stores, 54 USPQ2d 1068. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Steffe v. [read post]
