Search for: "Marty Lederman" Results 201 - 220 of 805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 10:03 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman tries mightily to interpret Bergdahl’s release as consistent* not inconsistent with the wishes of Congress, but I don’t think he succeeds. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:33 am by Jack Goldsmith
Late last month Marty Lederman flagged the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies’ endorsement of the Front-Page Rule: That informal precept, long employed by the leaders of US administrations, is that we should not engage in any secret, covert, or clandestine activity if we could not persuade the American people of the necessity and wisdom of such activities were they to learn of them as the result of a leak or other disclosure. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:13 am
Marty Lederman has a post up at Balkin about President Bush's recess appointment yesterday of Sam Fox as Ambassador to Belgium. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:15 pm
Marty Lederman pointed out this status report filed today in the Kim Davis case (Miller v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm by Andrew Koppelman
(Whenever any of us, such as Marty Lederman - now Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel - do ascend to positions of authority, you can tell this by the fact that we disappear from the blog.)So it’s worth noting that an actual U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Marty Lederman’s post examining the possible implications of the decision is here. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 3:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
  I recommend in particular Marty Lederman’s two posts on the relevance of the U.N. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” The panel, composed of Georgetown Law Professors Carrie Cordero, Laura Donohue, and Marty Lederman, focused on the FISA surveillance programs leaked by Edward Snowden and described in recently-declassified FISA materials, in particular the business records metadata collection program. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
At Balkinization, Marty Lederman notes that the federal government has filed its first brief opposing certiorari in the challenges by non-profit religious groups to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:09 am
As Marty Lederman notes over at Balkinization, it does not appear that Davis is fully complying with the federal court’s order. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Balkinization, Marty Lederman explains why, in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:55 pm by Jason Mazzone
I appreciate Marty Lederman's comment on the new Justia essay (by Vik Amar, Evan Caminker, and me) that I linked to on whether the ACA insurance mandate is valid without the tax penalty. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:42 pm by JB
  Marty Lederman, Even if it’s lawful . . . should we be concerned that it sets a dangerous precedent? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Reading the blogs today, you might think Marty Lederman and David Barron had gotten deeply in touch with their inner John Yoo when they wrote the Al-Aulaqi memo. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman The first part of John Brennan’s speech, as I explain below, is an explication of the Administration’s understanding of the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaida and its co-belligerents, the legal constraints governing our use of force, and the self-imposed parameters of the government’s use of force outside of “hot battlefields. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:50 am by Jack Goldsmith
Some follow-ups to my earlier post on the administration’s ISIL-specific AUMF: Marty Lederman has a good analysis of the substance of the draft AUMF that is consonant with my analysis. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:50 am by SHG
Georgetown lawprof Marty Lederman rejects the notion, calling it a “red herring. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:24 pm
Over at SCOTUSblog, posts by Tom Goldstein and Marty Lederman highlight how light the Supreme Court docket is this Term and ask whether there "are any particular categories of cases -- defined by subject-matter, reasons-for-grant, or otherwise -- to which the Court is being insufficiently attentive. [read post]