Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 261 - 280
of 806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 6:05 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman summarizes the status of the petitions seeking review of lower-court decisions upholding the accommodations offered by the Obama administration to non-profit religious groups that object to providing their female employees with health insurance that includes access to certain forms of birth control. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:01 am
(H/T: Marty Lederman). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:05 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:15 pm
Marty Lederman pointed out this status report filed today in the Kim Davis case (Miller v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:09 am
As Marty Lederman notes over at Balkinization, it does not appear that Davis is fully complying with the federal court’s order. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
I trust Marty's analysis. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:34 am
[Marty Lederman has more legal background here.] [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 3:12 am
Lyle Denniston reported on the latest developments for this blog, with (brief) commentary coming from Marty Lederman at Balkinization. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 10:54 am
" (H/T: Marty Lederman). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am
Commentary and analysis on the case come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization (with a follow-up post yesterday), Elizabeth Wydra at The Huffington Post, and Judith Schaeffer at The Huffington Post. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Marty Lederman has extensive analysis of this motion as well.Mic reports that conservative politicians are drawing analogies to the civil rights movement. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:32 pm
Marty Lederman parses Kentucky law and suggests that either the deputy-issued licenses are invalid or there was no need to hold Davis in contempt it was improper to throw Davis in jail (the contempt order was proper). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:55 am
At Balkinization, Marty Lederman notes that the federal government has filed its first brief opposing certiorari in the challenges by non-profit religious groups to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
As Marty Lederman has ably demonstrated, the Deal is neither a treaty nor even an executive agreement truly binding on the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
Marty’s analyses are always rich and brilliant, but notice how focused they are on the particular question being debated. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:44 pm
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
As detailed by Marty Lederman and others, under regulations adopted by the Reagan Administration, and endorsed in 1986 amendments to the Immigration and Naturalization Act, deferred action treatment triggers freedom to work and receive benefits such as the Low Income Tax Credit and Social Security.The court argument concerned a legal challenge to the Administration’s program, officially styled Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA), filed by Texas’ high… [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:33 am
"Update on the contraception coverage regulations and litigation": Marty Lederman had this post yesterday at "Balkinization. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:50 am
As Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman have argued, the deal could be legally valid without congressional approval if it is a nonbinding executive agreement. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:39 am
In a post at Balkinization, Marty Lederman looks at the impact of the Court’s 2014 decision in Burwell v. [read post]
