Search for: "Marvin v. Marvin" Results 81 - 100 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2019, 9:45 am by Steve Lubet
Oberlin President Marvin Krislov and others rejected the Gibson family’s repeated pleas to renounce the charge that they were racists, even when presented with strong statistical and anecdotal evidence that this was not the case. *** The Gibson’s v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
Princeton Vanguard, 114 USPQ2d at 1830 (citing Marvin Ginn, 228 USPQ at 530); Couch/Braunsdorf Affinity, Inc. v. 12 Interactive, LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1458, 1462 (TTAB 2014). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:46 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to jury trial — waiver Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Allegany County, John Marvin Nicholas, appellant, was convicted of second-degree assault. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:44 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Disparaging defense counsel’s integrity Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Marvin Wright, appellant was convicted of first-degree sexual offense, second-degree sexual offense, and sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
In thinking out loud on composers, craftsmanship and copycats Kat friends Jakob Wested and Jørgen Blomqvist discuss the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal decision regarding Robin Thicket and Pharell Williams's copyright infringement on Marvin Gaye's song "Got to Give it Up". [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It builds up tension (I-IV-V) and then Resolves it (V-I). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm by Ben
Sheeran argued that the LGO deposit defines the scope of protection, pointing to a previous case (Wolfe v. [read post]