Search for: "Marx v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
" [28] The remedy for violation of a non-compete agreement is either damages or an injunction. [29] Additionally, new employers may be held liable for hiring an employee who has signed a non-compete agreement with another employer. [30] V. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Ray v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
If so, what are the effects of any such downshift on the relation between the state and the political constitutions of China. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Marx, Gary T. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm
The facts are simply stated in the complaint. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
For the purpose of using the rule against a particular judge in a blanket fashion by a prosecuting agency, defender group or law firm (State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
It undergirded the English Civil War and the American Revolution; it helped shape the French Revolution; it got Karl Marx arrested; and in 1970s California it fired up an activist named Howard Jarvis, who shocked the political establishment with the success of Proposition 13, generally regarded as the first battleground of the modern property tax revolt.[1] With the benefit of hindsight, Proposition 13’s success appears obvious. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
The Feist Fallacy This erosion in Locke’s theory was bolstered by the US Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Feist Publications v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:14 am
The Feist Fallacy This erosion in Locke’s theory was bolstered by the US Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Feist Publications v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
” Marx said several times that once that often only when a thing develops to its classic or final state (including their extreme state) does it become possible to understand the stages of development and essential nature of a thing. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:07 pm
Long ago, the court held in Singer v. [read post]
