Search for: "Massachusetts General Life v. Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 3:47 pm
Related Blog Posts Federal Appellate Court Dismisses Lexapro Product Liability Suit Pending in Massachusetts Federal District Court – Marcus v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Alessi, Esquire, Adam Slutsky, Esquire, GOODWIN PROCTER LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and BlueSnap, Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:23 pm
The complaint only alleges chain of title problems based on Kemp v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
App. 1991) (“[a] hospital that utilizes an alleged defective product only in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action of strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product”); North Miami General Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
Additional Resources: DPS investigating accidental shooting at Valley gun show, December 3, 2015, Fox News, by News Desk More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
” Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability) §9 (1998); accord id. at comment a (§9 “appl[ies] to commercial product sellers”). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
Good For Life by 81, Inc., 2018 BL 250095 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:47 am
In Rottner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
See Bullard v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE and the Politics of Supply and Demand… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Under the UCL, “[d]amages cannot be recovered, and plaintiffs are generally limited to injunctive relief and restitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
S. 298, and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
[T]he generic manufacturer is not permitted to market the patented drug during the life of the patent; all that the generic can do is test the drug for purposes of submitting data to the FDA for approval. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Investors, including New York Life, TIAA-CREFF, a French banking subsidiary that I’ve never heard of, and other deep pockets, institutional investors, bought mortgage-backed securities, and were told they were safe, solid and secure, but instead they were, well… shoddy and shitty. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Murphy, No. 06-2292 The text of the Massachusetts SDP statute, as interpreted by state courts, does not on its face violate the due process protections heretofore afforded sexually dangerous persons subject to civil commitment. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Katz generally represents celebrities; involved in Adderly v. [read post]
