Search for: "Massachusetts Trustees v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled in the case of BELLEMARE vs. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:18 am
Bye-bye mortgage, said United States Bankruptcy Judge William Hillman, in a case heard in his court. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:46 am
Bankruptcy Trustee v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm
The legislative history states: "Subparagraph (A) is intended to codify current case law e. g., Neal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Trustee's position declaring that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional by finding that it violated the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:15 am
Massachusetts (1905) and Zucht v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
Written by: Andrew Royce Some alarm has been raised among the real estate bar by the recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit in Steven Weiss, Chapter 7 Trustee, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:29 am
Sanchez (cross-commissioned tribal police officer) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
The persistent vegetative state was an important issue in the 1990 United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:00 am
If the property is in the United States at the time of the confiscation, then the US courts will recognize the foreign act of state only if it is consistent with US law and policy. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
The complaint in Trustees for Harvard University v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
See Bullard v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:31 am
Trustees of Boston University v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am
A case in the Massachusetts Court of Appeals, Ajemian v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
Mazza, 394 Mass. 176 (1985) (plaintiff alleging violations of Massachusetts Declaration of Rights need not allege state action); but see Redgrave v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:04 am
Witkowski v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
The Trustee then has to determine whether the attempted exercise of the power is legally effective, given that both the Trustee and the power holder have fiduciary duties under the Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code. 2. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
