Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 141 - 160
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
They sue the EPA. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm
(Thus, for instance, the Supreme Court declined to defer to the Environmental Protection Agency’s argument (in 2007’s Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
” In response to those rulings, EPA in 2015 promulgated new regulations defining the term, commonly known as the “WOTUS Rule. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 7:24 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), would like to avoid. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of “Business and the Roberts Court” (Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 342), edited by Jonathan H. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
Likewise, a federal court in Massachusetts found triable questions on whether a senior network engineer suffering from severe depression could perform his duties at home and whether that would have been a reasonable accommodation (Moebius v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
In the recent decision of United States of America v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Has the Roberts Court been a pro-business court? [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:04 pm
EPA and City of Arlington v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
EPA illustrated. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
— Michigan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Some of the conservative justices invoked Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:16 am
Although the chief justice is a bit of a standing hawk, I think he will also recognize that the argument for standing in this case is substantially stronger than in cases such as Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am
But the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision holding that Massachusetts had standing to sue the EPA for its refusal to regulate greenhouse gasses has led scholars to reevaluate these arguments. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Massachusetts, 14-10078, is a huge winner after nine relists. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Massachusetts, 14-10078, which is probably on its ninth relist, and if so, surely an opinion of some sort is on the way. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
Recognizing that aviation noise is a public health issue that can no longer be ignored, the Aviation Innovation, Reform and Reauthorization Act of 2016 (AIRR) contains several provisions that seem to address the problem of aviation noise. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
EPA 15-599Issue: Whether the Third Circuit erred by deferring to EPA’s interpretation of the words “total maximum daily load” to permit EPA to impose a complex regulatory scheme that does much more than cap daily levels of total pollutant loading and that displaces powers reserved to the states. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
In making that finding, the Fifth Circuit looked to Massachusetts v. [read post]
