Search for: "Masse v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:54 pm
Per the United States Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in Mississippi v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:05 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
In each case, the plaintiffs argued that CAFA entitles them to remand to the United States District Courts in California from which they were transferred. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm
A separate case was filed in the United States, but the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, but that court dismissed the case on forum non conveniens grounds in 2002, a decision that was upheld by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
United States, which is an as-applied challenge to the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:40 am
United States of America ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
Mass. 2009) (citing United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:42 am
A case on petition for Certiorari before the United States Supreme Court raises the issue of what is the correct test for courts to apply to determine the applicability of the routine booking exception to Miranda. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
One of the most fascinating things about practicing mass tort litigation is when these cases intersect with international law and policy, as they did recently in O'Bryan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:26 pm
Yesterday, Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts, whose sentencing work always merits attention, issued an interesting opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Notice Requirement: Employers must notify affected workers or their representatives (e.g., labor unions), the State dislocated worker unit, and the appropriate unit of local government at least 60 days before a covered plant closing or mass layoff occurs. [read post]
