Search for: "Massey v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court indicated Friday that it will decide a case that comes close to the very fundamental question of whether justice and a court can be bought. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Hillary Clinton when she was running for president (Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Rights Prisoner Must Petition Federal Court in Massachusetts For RRC Placement for Last Six Months of Sentence United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am by Marcia Narine
United States, companies have endured strict liability for the criminal acts of employees who were acting within the scope of their employment and who were motivated in part by an intent to benefit the corporation. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
Massey that the Court mandated the recusal of a state supreme court chief justice hearing a case involving a corporate executive who had made large independent expenditures supporting the chief justice’s election. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:20 pm
Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Kelly issued a press release yesterday, praising the United States Supreme Court for its decision in Caperton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by David Orentlicher
In particular, the constitutional challenge ultimately rests on a flawed premise—that if Congress can require people to buy a good or service solely because they are living in the United States, the commerce clause will be converted into an expansive power to compel just about any purchase. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Massey that the Court mandated the recusal of a state supreme court chief justice hearing a case involving a corporate executive who had made large independent expenditures supporting the chief justice’s election. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
United States (08-192) and Dean v. [read post]