Search for: "Matisoff v. Dobi" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 7:22 am by John (Jack) Barnosky
” The Second Department affirmed the decision of the court below that the defect could be remedied, distinguishing the case from Matisoff v Dobi, 90 NY2d 127 (1997) where the agreement had not been acknowledged at all and Galetta v Galetta, 21 NY3d 186 (2013) where the agreement was acknowledged but defective in the same respect as in this case, but the notary did not know the decedent and although he could describe his usual procedure, could not… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
            At the outset it pointed out that Matisoff v Dobi, 90 N.Y.2d 127, 681 N.E.2d 376, 659 N.Y.S.2d 209, (1997) was not controlling here. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
            At the outset it pointed out that Matisoff v Dobi, 90 N.Y.2d 127, 681 N.E.2d 376, 659 N.Y.S.2d 209, (1997) was not controlling here. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, Third Department  Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that  he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father             In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021)  petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
For her first affirmative defense and objection, Irene asserted that the prenuptial agreement was defective, invalid, and unenforceable pursuant to the 2013 New York Court of Appeals decision in Galetta v Galetta, 21 N.Y.3d 186, because the acknowledgments omitted language expressly stating that the notaries knew the signers or had ascertained, through some sort of proof, that the signers were the persons described as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]