Search for: "Matisoff v. Dobi"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
” The Second Department affirmed the decision of the court below that the defect could be remedied, distinguishing the case from Matisoff v Dobi, 90 NY2d 127 (1997) where the agreement had not been acknowledged at all and Galetta v Galetta, 21 NY3d 186 (2013) where the agreement was acknowledged but defective in the same respect as in this case, but the notary did not know the decedent and although he could describe his usual procedure, could not… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
At the outset it pointed out that Matisoff v Dobi, 90 N.Y.2d 127, 681 N.E.2d 376, 659 N.Y.S.2d 209, (1997) was not controlling here. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
At the outset it pointed out that Matisoff v Dobi, 90 N.Y.2d 127, 681 N.E.2d 376, 659 N.Y.S.2d 209, (1997) was not controlling here. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Dobi, 90 NY2d 127 (1997). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Dobi, 90 NY2d 127 (1997). [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 12:23 pm
Matisoff v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 1:45 pm
Domestic Relations Law §236(B)(3); Matisoff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
For her first affirmative defense and objection, Irene asserted that the prenuptial agreement was defective, invalid, and unenforceable pursuant to the 2013 New York Court of Appeals decision in Galetta v Galetta, 21 N.Y.3d 186, because the acknowledgments omitted language expressly stating that the notaries knew the signers or had ascertained, through some sort of proof, that the signers were the persons described as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]