Search for: "Matsuda v. City and County of Honolulu"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 1:56 pm
City and County of Honolulu, No. 06-15337 (Jan 14, 2008). [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:41 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 512 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:02 pm
The City and County of Honolulu has filed a petition for writ of certiorari in Matsuda v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:01 am
As noted in this post, the City and County of Honolulu has sought US Supreme Court review of Matsuda v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:40 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1995)) and state (Richardson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:06 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued an opinion in Matsuda v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:08 pm
Matsuda v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:21 pm
Matsuda v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 5:49 pm
City and County of Honolulu, No. 07-1305 (petition for cert. filed Apr. 14, 2008) (can a city bind itself to exercise eminent domain) Clark County v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:27 am
City and County of Honolulu, No. 06-15337 (Jan 14, 2008), where the Ninth Circuit panel -- in a case involving a Contracts Clause claim which was brought together with a substantive due process claim -- added: Furthermore, we express no opinion as to whether our decision in Armendariz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
City & County of Honolulu, No. 06-15337 In an action raising the issue of whether the Constitution imposes any limit on the City of Honolulu's power to repudiate a contract to convey property to a private citizen in connection with its leasehold conversion program, summary judgment for the city is vacated and remanded where: 1) contrary to the ruling below, the heightened scrutiny test of U.S. [read post]
