Search for: "Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc."
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
In Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
In Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm
The Ninth Circuit imported the test into the trademark realm in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:06 pm
MCA Records (9th Cir. 2002), the “Barbie Girl” case). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:24 pm
In one decision, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:43 pm
MCA Records, Inc. (9th Cir. 2002) 296 F.3d 894. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 908 (9th Cir. 2002).5. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 901 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See also A & M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
MCA Records, 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:35 pm
There are lots of cases on all this, such as Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
MCA Records, Inc. (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:59 pm
The Rogers test was adopted by the 9th Circuit in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
App. 418, 333 N.W.2d 67 (1983) Judges say the silliest things: Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am
FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
MCA Records, a/k/a the Barbie Girl opinion? [read post]
