Search for: "Mattel Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2021, 1:08 pm
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 97 N.E.3d 389 (N.Y. 2018). [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:34 pm
But lookie here: A federal appeals court has ruled that Mattel Inc. doesn’t... [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm
Comic Mix LLC Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm
Time Inc., Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., and the test for confusion under s. 6 of the Trademarks Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:32 pm
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), quoting Moses H. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:59 pm
The Rogers test was adopted by the 9th Circuit in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 11:34 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), held that parties cannot agree to more extensive judicial review than § 10 of the FAA but suggested that narrower judicial review may also be a concern. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:55 am
Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc. is the controlling case. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:42 am
Mattel, Inc., 601 F.3d 1387, 94 USPQ2d 1315, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 584 (2008), the Supreme Court resolved a Circuit split involving the grounds on which an arbitration award may be vacated or modified. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Mattel, Inc., 945 F.2d 536. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Mattel, Inc., 945 F.2d 536. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
The speakers were Kim Culmone (Mattel), Michael Moore (Mattel) and Peter Dernbach (Winkler Partners). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Mattel, Inc., 601 F.3d 1387, 94 USPQ2d 1315, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 8:11 am
In its annual 10-K filing, Mattel Inc. recently revealed that it received a subpoena from the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:08 am
Mattel, Inc. , Case No. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1315 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:46 am
Background The applicant, Mattel, Inc. invoked before the EUIPO invalidity division Article 25(1)(b) of the Community designs regulation (CDR) in conjunction with Article 4(1) and Articles 5 and 6 CDR stating that: prior design had been disclosed more than 12 months before the priority date of the contested RCD;the contested RCD lacked novelty;the contested RCD lacked individual character. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:47 am
Drape Creative, Inc., No. 16-56715 (9th Cir. [read post]
