Search for: "Matter of "Female" V. v German V."
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
MGN and Steve McClaren v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The case, Ruusunen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Meire is a German ad agency retained by Rimowa. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Only the German-born British judge seems to have thought this through”. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
| IT Law Summer School returns to beautiful Cambridge | BREAKING: German FCJ declares AdBlock Plus legal | Book review: Droit d’auteur 4.0 / Copyright 4.0 | From IP practitioner to murder mystery author: Roz Watkins and "The Devil's Dice" (a pity about that patent attorney in the opening scene) | Weekly Roundup: Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
| German ‘hate-speech’ law tries to regulate Facebook and others - will it work? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
publishers’ right in online publications | German Court: TV show may not use ‘bloopers’ from other network without permission | US Congress considers extending copyright term | Swedish ISP Telenor will voluntary block The Pirate Bay | You don't think that street names matter: Try telling your grandchildren that your fancy office is on "Crustacean Street" | Stay of injunction in public interest: Edwards Lifesciences v Boston |… [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
In this case, the ECHR found that the public did not have a legitimate interest to know where Princess Caroline was, as the photographs related to private matters. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Reciting Articles 65(2) and 76 CTMR, it observed that the Court’s scrutiny is limited to the facts, evidence and arguments brought by the parties during the previous proceedings, and to the matters of law thereby examined (Case T-57/03, Société provençale d’achat et de gestion (SPAG) SAS v OHIM). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
Does centrality of place and circumstance matter? [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am
The court has not taken into regard the ratio of section 110 German Code of Civil Procedure. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
(Neither would a Canadian marriage nor a German marriage.) [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
Female MP’s have written a letter in support of the Duchess of Sussex. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:32 am
At 9:45 at night.Silvia Paternain gives vent to her irritation at the male lawyers in her department watching the Spain v Honduras match, while her female colleagues – who have no interest in the beautiful game – are toiling away at their desks. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
This includes paragraphs 18, 19, 63-67, and 69, which are directly germane to the plaintiff's theory of the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Europe: EDPB issues Recommendations on Supplementary Measures and European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures following Schrems II”. [read post]
