Search for: "Matter of Alexis B."
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 11:09 am
– Alexis The post What Matters to Me Workbook appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:05 pm
The post Useful Info During COVID v.3 appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 11:50 am
Alexis The post Join Me on April 14th for National Healthcare Decisions Day appeared first on The Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
16 May 2023, 10:46 am
Alexis The post A Common Misconception about Wills and Probate appeared first on The Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
appeared first on The Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
– Alexis The post Reimagining Elder Care & Disability Care appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:38 am
The post The Difference Between a Will and a Beneficiary Designation… and Why It’s Important appeared first on The Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 8:03 am
Alexis The post Five Estate Planning and Elder Law Mistakes that Could Come Back to Haunt You appeared first on The Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
Texas law recognizes a claim for public disclosure of private facts which requires showing: (a) a form of publicity – print, photo, audio or video recording – given to matters concerning your private life, (b) the published facts are highly sensitive to a person of reasonable, ordinary sensibilities, and (c) the published information was not a legitimate public concern, or “newsworthy. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
– Alexis & Doreen The post Useful Info During COVID v.4 appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:04 pm
The post Seeking an Associate appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 7:44 am
Alexis Martin, 2016-1891. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
Practice Tip #2: While this case was not an Indiana intellectual property case, we include it in the Indiana Intellectual Property Law Blog to congratulate Alexis Hutchinson, a valued and talented member of the Overhauser Law Offices team, on her well-deserved success in litigating this matter. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Read now » Related Content Healthcare Providers and Insurers: Healthcare Provider Merger Enforcement Actions Chart Review this analysis from Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys Alexis J. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:28 am
Not only because, as Alexis de Tocqueville famously observed, political questions in the United States often turn into legal questions. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 10:20 am
b) A survivor and victim focus group – to hear the views of victims, survivors and their advocates on the proposals. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, and as the Governor and Lieutenant Governor are subject to its jurisdiction, Supreme Court should have granted defendant's request that those officers be joined as necessary parties and ordered them summoned (see CPLR 1001 [b]; 1003; Matter of Alexy v Otte, 58 AD3d 967, 967-968 [2009]; see also State Finance Law § 123-b [2] [permitting a plaintiff in an action concerning a wrongful expenditure of state funds to "join as a party… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, and as the Governor and Lieutenant Governor are subject to its jurisdiction, Supreme Court should have granted defendant's request that those officers be joined as necessary parties and ordered them summoned (see CPLR 1001 [b]; 1003; Matter of Alexy v Otte, 58 AD3d 967, 967-968 [2009]; see also State Finance Law § 123-b [2] [permitting a plaintiff in an action concerning a wrongful expenditure of state funds to "join as a party… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, and as the Governor and Lieutenant Governor are subject to its jurisdiction, Supreme Court should have granted defendant's request that those officers be joined as necessary parties and ordered them summoned (see CPLR 1001 [b]; 1003; Matter of Alexy v Otte, 58 AD3d 967, 967-968 [2009]; see also State Finance Law § 123-b [2] [permitting a plaintiff in an action concerning a wrongful expenditure of state funds to "join as a party… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Accordingly, and as the Governor and Lieutenant Governor are subject to its jurisdiction, Supreme Court should have granted defendant's request that those officers be joined as necessary parties and ordered them summoned (see CPLR 1001 [b]; 1003; Matter of Alexy v Otte, 58 AD3d 967, 967-968 [2009]; see also State Finance Law § 123-b [2] [permitting a plaintiff in an action concerning a wrongful expenditure of state funds to "join as a party… [read post]
