Search for: "Matter of Allen v Stanford" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Troice, 12-88, all involving the preclusive effect of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act on state-law claims against entities that performed investment-related work for Allen Stanford’s Ponzi scheme. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Stanford’s Cyberlaw blog has noted Apple’s attempts to increase the security of their iPhones by integrating a USB Restricted Mode feature. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
Allen Stanford allegedly used to chisel billions of dollars from unwitting investors. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
Title: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-306 Title: Allen v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 Or the author of a respected treatise (Wigmore on Evidence, for example) might have been viewed as an epistemic authority on matters within the scope of the author's expertise. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal directed the matter to return to the High Court to decide whether the act provides “adequate safeguards for the protection of a journalist’s sources or confidential journalistic material in relation to communications obtained by means of a bulk equipment interference warrant”. [read post]