Search for: "Matter of Application for Water Rights" Results 61 - 80 of 2,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Maira Sutton
Though having such a framework is better than having no language acknowledging the interests of the users and other creators, a restrictive application of the three-step test could restrict fair use and other rights to protect innovation and access to knowledge. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:49 am by Michael Connell
Only if the applicant can successfully meet both tests will they have the right to bring an appeal before the ERT. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
No matter how developed a justice system is, it will always remain vulnerable to human failure. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:47 am by Bob Kraft
Other disputes, such as fishing rights and environmental concerns are usually handled by the federal court of the nation controlling those waters. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The IPER contained the following statement (English translation):“… The present application does not fulfil the requirements of Article 33(1) PCT because the subject-matter of claim 1 is not novel within the meaning of Article 33(2) PCT.In D1 the ratio of the weight of the textiles and the weight of the water is disclosed to be between 1:100 and 1:1. [read post]
Earlier laws in California, Australia, and the United Kingdom focused on reporting about human rights or, as in the cases of India, Kenya, Japan, and Thailand, reporting on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters more generally. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 1:24 pm by Sutherland LNG
Oregon LNG filed suit last year to challenge ACE’s easement rights to the land beneath the water on the Skipanon Peninsula in Warrenton, Ore. [read post]
The post Defamation Claims: Stormy Days and Muddy Waters appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
The post Defamation Claims: Stormy Days and Muddy Waters appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unfortunately, over the years the waters have been muddied by courts, in numerous ways. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The eligible person obtains the right by registering the use with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), paying a fee, and then putting the water to “reasonable and beneficial use. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Andrew Delaney
Shortly thereafter, the court rules on cross-summary judgment motions largely in applicant’s favor on the subdivision appeal, reserving only the question of applicant’s compliance with a section of the City ordinance that prohibits development on “lots that do not have frontage on a public road or public waters,” except for those “lots of record existing as of January 1, 2007…if access to such road or public waters exists by a… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:40 pm
., and other cases, which provides that a coal owner like Levisa owns the coal and appurtenant rights necessary to access and mine its coal, but not unrelated rights such as the right to store mine water from another's mine. 2. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
The courts have looked at “irrigation return flows” but that exemption is not applicable here. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:20 am by Rosalind English
Striking out such claims, said the Court, would undermine the very essence of the right of individual applications by legal persons, as it would encourage governments to deprive such entities of the possibility to pursue an application lodged at a time when they enjoyed legal personality… The case raises interesting questions with regard to the policing and punishment of tax evasion, a matter which Strasbourg generally prefers to leave to national… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:50 am by Rosalind English
The widest flowing stream of judicial review applications involves asylum and immigration matters, which as Sumption explains are approached from the different end of a telescope. [read post]