Search for: "Matter of Applications for Authority" Results 1 - 20 of 27,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 2:51 pm
Principles relevant to this matter include the following:the onus to establish a proper basis for the stay is on the applicant for the stay. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
Accordingly, the USPTO issued a notice, telling such applicants to cut it out:The USPTO has noticed a significant number of international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office (RO/US) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) where the applicant has chosen an International Searching Authority (ISA) which is not competent for the subject matter of the claimed invention. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Gary Maze
In Part I of this five-part guide to U.S. subsequent patent applications, the authors reviewed the law governing such applications. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:54 pm by Vercammen Law
 Court denied counsel fees to court appointed counselIN THE MATTER OF A.D., ETC A-2563-21The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in its application of the law or abused its discretion in its denial of appellants' fee applications. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Michelle Santarossa
One Store per Authorization A separate application is required in respect of each proposed cannabis retail store, and a retail store authorization that is issued only authorizes the operation of the store specified in the application for the authorization. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
– On April 3, 2019 at 9 a.m., the House Judiciary Committee will markup a resolution to authorize subpoenas for Special Counsel Mueller’s full and complete report, its underlying evidence and related matters. [read post]
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019] UKSC 9 (6 March 2019) is a good example of a case where a court, with the best will in the world, in endeavouring to make a good case management decision inadvertently acts unlawfully. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
In Understanding College Application Decisions: Why College Sports Success Matters, the authors assess the influence of college athletic success on applications (proxied by sent SAT scores). [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:24 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today ruled in a precedential decision that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) correctly rejected a patent applicant’s reissue claims as “impermissibly attempting to recapture subject matter that the patentee intentionally surrendered during prosecution. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:24 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today ruled in a precedential decision that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) correctly rejected a patent applicant’s reissue claims as “impermissibly attempting to recapture subject matter that the patentee intentionally surrendered during prosecution. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:43 am by Zaid Majiet
They withdrew the matter because they were under the mistaken belief that this was the applicant’s instruction. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:23 pm
The Examiner's rationale for the rejection was that multiple inventors were listed, yet the subject matter of the application was based on a Ph.D. thesis with a single author. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 12:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The application data sheet (ADS) includes a section where the patent applicant indicates its source of authority for filing the patent application, with the following options: Assignee Person to whom the inventor is obligated to assign Legal representative under Section 117 (for death or incapacity of the inventor) Joint inventor Person who shows sufficient proprietary interest. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Gary Maze
In Part I of this five-part guide to U.S. subsequent patent applications, the authors reviewed the law governing such applications. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:30 am
Courts have a limited authority in modifying a disciplinary penalty imposed by the appointing authority Matter of Mary Ellis v Mahon, 2008 NY Slip Op 06737, Decided on September 9, 2008, Court of Appeals In Ellis v Mahon, 49 AD2d 538, the Appellate Division the annulled the disciplinary penalty imposed on Mary Ellis - dismissal - and remanded the matter to the appointing authority "for the imposition of an appropriate penalty less severe than… [read post]
1 May 2022, 12:34 pm by Thalia Kruger
Milieu Consulting is conducting a study on the application of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels Ia Regulation) on behalf of the European Commission (DG JUST). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:34 am by Anders Valentin (Bugge Valentin)
In a highly principled matter, the Danish Maritime and Commercial High Court has ruled to dismiss Novartis’ application for a preliminary injunction against Glenmark, Zentiva, and Viatris based on the patent application EP 2 959 894 (the “894-application”). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 3:03 am
This decision from the Fifth District reminds us that, in Florida, circuit courts are courts of plenary jurisdiction which have authority over any matter not expressly denied them by the state constitution or applicable statutes. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
As a matter of policy the Authority deemed that “disciplinary action is pending” if the employee has been informed that disciplinary charges are being prepared. [read post]