Search for: "Matter of Bartley"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 11:13 am
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Edward Lee Bartley may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:11 am
In an opinion issued yesterday, In the Matter of the Estate of Bartley J. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:11 pm
The tasks included arranging to buy and wrap a "box of chocolates and a thank you card" for the secretary of a doctor whose medical report was needed.The then Solicitors' Complaints Tribunal ruled: "No fair-minded practitioner would be justified in charging his or her client at what the tribunal regards as an unusually high rate across the large number of hours involved including the significant time on the mundane matters of the kind described. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:36 am
Quite often I attend the big gala fundraiser/lunch/dinner for various public interest law groups, which usually have progressive politics, and unless I’m mistaken I’ve seen judges attend in the same matter as Justice Alito did—with no personal participation in the solicitation of funds or membership. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 12:22 pm
Bartley Dinner sponsored by the conservative magazine The American Spectator. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
In the end, the court found that the expert was qualified by his education, training, and lengthy work history to testify as to product design and safety in this matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 10:46 am
" NFP civil opinions today (1): In the Matter of the Supervised Administration of the Estate of Martha Wakefield, Deceased, Cinda Bartley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:17 pm
Larry Richard Bartley (NFP) - "Lafayette argues that inasmuch as there are no issues of material fact and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the trial court should have granted summary judgment in its favor on its complaint against Bartley for an account stated based on medical bills that Bartley has allegedly failed to pay. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Parties seeking to disqualify a surviving spouse should be mindful that, as the Nichols court noted, the “statutes granting to a spouse a right of election are remedial and should be construed in the interest of the surviving spouse to give . . . her the broadest possible protection” (quoting Matter of Bartley, 83 Misc 2d 672, 679 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1975]). [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:57 am
The recent case is Bartley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
Bartley, 712 N.E.2d 537, 547 (Ind. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
Kirke Bartley Jr. ruled Wednesday from the bench. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
He also argued that there would be breaches of articles 6, 8 and/or 14 if the matter were not remitted. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Parties seeking to disqualify a surviving spouse should be mindful that, as the Nichols court noted, the “statutes granting to a spouse a right of election are remedial and should be construed in the interest of the surviving spouse to give . . . her the broadest possible protection” (quoting Matter of Bartley, 83 Misc 2d 672, 679 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1975]). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 9:12 am
Ah, but there is the matter of the “commercial purposes” issue, no? [read post]
Case Law, Australia: O’Reilly v Edgar, Fact free Facebook Posts, $250,000 damages – Gabrielle Hunter
23 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm
It was found that Mr Edgar was, at best, uninterested in checking the truth or falsity of the matters he posted and that a “modicum of diligence … would have revealed the foolishness of his conclusions”. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
There’s really no chance, no matter how sound its arguments and evidence are, that it will persuade any corporate media theorists.Nevertheless, if you are sympathetic to such corporate media theories, I still hope you’ll read it. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:21 am
As Bartley Madden explains: “Before you know it, the formula itself predetermines the result. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
"[A] client has an absolute right, at any time, with or without cause, to terminate the attorney-client relationship by discharging the attorney" (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 43; see Solomon v Bartley, 203 AD2d 449). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Non-equity partners get the partner honorific, but in actuality they’re often just glorified senior associates, at least when it comes to matters like salary and major firm decisions. [read post]
