Search for: "Matter of Breslin v Breslin"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
Breslin. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:25 am
Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
In Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:05 am
In Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
Your right to repair matters. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:53 am
" In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of J.P. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:17 am
Read the entire matter Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Goldstein, Beau Breslin, Samuel J. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
In order to show proximate cause, the plaintiff-client must establish that "but for" the attorney s negligence, the plaintiff would have prevailed in the matter at issue or would not have sustained any damages (Levine v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:30 pm
Breslin, in which the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's denial of respondent's motion for a change of venue. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
After the trial in the action began in December 2013, defendant became concerned about how her then-attorney was handling the matter and retained plaintiff to represent her going forward. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am
Ct. 2014); See also Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
Thus, the final arbitration award bars the cause of action to recover damages for overbilling (see CPLR 3211[a][5]; Breslin Realty Dev. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Guarino v N. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
This principle was reaffirmed in a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Armentano v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Matter of Tashenberg v Breslin, 89 AD2d 812, 812 [1982]), our review of the record reveals that petitioner did not request any other relief here, only minimal disclosure. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:35 am
In a New York case called Breslin v Frankel, the court held that the plaintiff’s 19-year delay in attempting to exercise the option to purchase defendant’s shares in a realty-holding corporation was unreasonable as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
In Fahrenholz v. [read post]
