Search for: "Matter of Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Police Dept." Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" 'An action is arbitrary and capricious when it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts' " (id.; see Matter of Erie County Sheriff's Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v County of Erie, 159 AD3d 1561, 1562 [4th Dept 2018]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" 'An action is arbitrary and capricious when it is taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts' " (id.; see Matter of Erie County Sheriff's Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v County of Erie, 159 AD3d 1561, 1562 [4th Dept 2018]). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
The police report further indicated that Piontkowski was going to re-interview plaintiff and then forward the matter to the New York State Insurance Frauds Bureau. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 25, 2011  Buffalo Marine Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]