Search for: "Matter of Butler v Butler" Results 61 - 80 of 506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The shrinking terms of hotel management agreements Better bargaining position for hotel owners on HMAs by Jim Butler and Mark S. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” To Brandeis, the only thing that mattered was Butler’s “views as to property. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Late in its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its unanimous opinion in Kakos v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“BIR is entitled to enforce its charging lien, the existence of which has been recognized by the court (Matter of Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, 190 AD3d 573 [1st Dept 2021]), and the amount of which was set by stipulation against certain funds held in escrow by plaintiff’s counsel, while maintaining its counterclaim in plaintiff’s legal malpractice action (see Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v Gelmin, 235 AD2d 218, 218-219 [1st Dept… [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
So said Lord Justice Thorpe, beginning his judgment in Mansfield v Mansfield [2011] EWCA Civ 1056. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm by Bexis
Thanks and congratulations to Christy Jones and Anita Modak-Truran of Butler Snow for letting us know about - and more importantly winning - today's decision in Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:32 am
The authors of www.PatentLawyerBlog.com are patent trial lawyers at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:21 am
" And that matters because the publishers may have botched their first shot. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am by Alan Butler
Alan Butler is senior counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which filed amici briefs in support of petitioner David Riley in Riley v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:18 am by Curt Cutting
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008).California courts have already grappled with the first question as a matter of state law. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
She directed herself by reference to the guidance offered by Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P. at paragraph 85 of Payne v Payne (guidance apt for applications by primary carers) rather than by reference to the decision of Hedley J in Re Y [2004] 2 FLR 330 (the only authority then available directly considering a relocation application by a care sharer).3. [read post]