Search for: "Matter of C. F. v C. M."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[3] Critical Infrastructure Sector: As a threshold matter, an entity is only a Covered Entity if it belongs to one of 16 industries that qualify as critical infrastructure sectors under the Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Michael Cohen[5], Attorney David M. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
The defense had identified another two studies that were germane.[15] Chief Judge Rosenstengel’s opinion is noteworthy for its fine attention to detail, detail that matters to the validity of the expert witness’s enterprise. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
§ 1.263(a)-4(b)(1)(v) [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, 928 F. 3d 226 (2d Cir. 2019), vacated as moot sub nom, Biden v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Tal como nas fórmulas do patético de Aby Warburg, não se distingue nelas criação e performance, original e cópia. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
New Section 261(a)(1) is being added in light of Crispo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:27 am
Papish v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(Knight v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
Raimondo (another case I’m working on) and with the Fifth Circuit likely to hear an Appointments Clause challenge to the whole council system in Arnesen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” 11 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
See, e.g., Wayne C. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The court explained that in Matter of M. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The court explained that in Matter of M. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[5] Finally, the Commission’s mandatory language states that “[i]f Defendant breaches this agreement, the Commission may petition the Court to vacate the Final Judgment and restore this action to its active docket. [read post]
