Search for: "Matter of Capital One Bank, N.A." Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 7:06 am by Lori J. Sommerfield
Capital One, N.A., which urged the court to reverse a district court ruling that an individual who had already received credit from the defendant and who was not currently applying to the defendant for credit was not an “applicant” for purposes of the ECOA’s adverse action notice requirement. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Bank One, N.A., 216 S.W.3d 825. 826-27 (Tex. 2007) (resolving doubt as to scope of arbitration agreement covering disputes "arising from or relating in any way to this Agreement" in favor of coverage); 950 Corbindale, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Bank One, N.A., 216 S.W.3d 825. 826-27 (Tex. 2007) (resolving doubt as to scope of arbitration agreement covering disputes "arising from or relating in any way to this Agreement" in favor of coverage); 950 Corbindale, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Each petition presents the same question the Court recently declined to hear in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
Introduction       The idea that by engaging in fraudulent behavior one incurs liability for the foreseeable harm caused by such behavior is a cornerstone of the law. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under this principle, “[i]t is not necessary that the precise legal theories presented in the first action also be presented in the second action” (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Luxama, 172 AD3d 1341 [2d Dept 2019]), so long as both suits “aris[e] out of the same subject matter or series of alleged wrongs” (JFK Family Ltd. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Background The dispute in Kirschner arose out of a $1.775 billion syndicated loan transaction that closed on April 16, 2014.[4] The loan at issue in this matter is generally referred to as “Term Loan B”—a relatively widely syndicated term loan with terms similar to those of high yield bonds. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:42 pm by Randall Reese
"Today, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its role as trustee under the senior indenture governing the first tier and second tier tax-exempt bonds, joined in Ambac's motion. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
Assuming the dispute between the lawfirm and the client is split into two parallel proceedings -- one in court, the other one the arbitral forum -- does it matter which one rules first on the voidness issue? [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
., WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP, STANLEY GALLANT, GALSTER CAPITAL LLC, GARLSTER MANAGEMENT CORP., ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Here the court discusses the "abstention" question, whether the court should permit state court actions to go on, or to remove them to the Bankruptcy court as a "core" issue. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]