Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
Consider, for example, what the cert. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
The Rio Tinto decision is now pending cert before the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
It appears likely that Occidental will seek cert later this month. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:54 am
Conti could insist on clarification of the same matter in a regular proceeding, which would take a while, but then a further appeal would be possible (either if permitted by the court of second instance, or by bringing the equivalent of a U.S. cert petition). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:08 am
App. 243, 248, 928 A.2d 575, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 940, 937 A.2d 698 (2007). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
Persuading the Justices that an area of law is of sufficient interest is also something that can require multiple years of effort, including several years of cert denials, until the Court begins to appreciate the numbers of cases and the depth of interest. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm
Solove argues (and I agree) that Snyder's claims are weak as a matter of tort law and the First Amendment and should fail. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:04 pm
Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has such a relationship. [read post]
8 May 2013, 11:30 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:56 am
" The court therefore concluded that "Apollo is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
The Law Strongly Favors Quickly Issuing the Mandate The law is on the side of an expeditious mandate, even – and especially – if this case merits Supreme Court review. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
After trial, defendants moved for JNOV, arguing, inter alia, that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiffs’ warnings claim was preempted, under principles of implied conflict preemption. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
The Justices denied Allstate’s petition for cert raising questions about the Rule 23 class action commonality requirement and due process rights. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:28 am
The Supreme Court has granted cert in three cases, a two-to-one circuit court split, to decide the question of what “sex” means under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" My prediction that the Court will grant the petition and hear the case is based not only on the fact that this is a pretty important question of constitutional law, but on the existence of a clear split of authority on the matter. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Doc Berman over at Sentencing Law & Policy recently asked what "sleeper" cases at the US Supreme Court people were watching, and I mentioned that, though not a sentencing issue per se, I was interested in the outcome of of Melendez-Diaz v Massachussetts, which was granted cert this spring and will be argued this fall. [read post]
