Search for: "Matter of Charlie C. (Thomas C.)" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 1:11 pm by rbm3
A MATTER OF DISPUTE: MORALITY, DEMOCRACY, AND LAW / CHRISTOPHER J. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
Video of the event is available on C-SPAN. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:34 am by Just Security
Karoun Demirjian and Charlie Savage report for the New York Times. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:26 am by J. Dana Stuster
Thomas Cavanna tackles the biggest example of Chinese efforts to construct and leverage an asymmetric network of its own, the Belt and Road Initiative. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The fact that her desire to kill her child comes from sincere religious commitments will not matter in a case like that. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Kim, Thomas Drake, Bradley Manning, and Jeffrey Sterling, although it should be noted that the Drake and Sterling investigations began during the administration of George W. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
House committee seeking financial records from former President Trump reached an agreement that ends litigation on the matter and requires an accounting firm to turn over some of the material. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But the rise of politics in the workplace has consequences for polarization across the country, said Johnny C. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The defendent, Rachel Myers, withdrew her allegations unreservedly and apologised to Lady Colthurst “for the distress and embarrassment which this matter caused [the Claimant]. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them handle the… [read post]