Search for: "Matter of Children's Rights v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs." Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 4:20 am
Dismissal from a position because the individual does not possess a valid required license or certification is not a disciplinary terminationMatter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 2010 NY Slip Op 02432, Decided on March 25, 2010, Court of Appeals[Decided with Matter of New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services v Victor… [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm by cmahanna
Custody, Parenting Time, and Issues Involving Children with Autism cmahanna Tue, 04/25/2023 - 15:11 United States New Jersey By Lawrence R. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The statutory rights of employees of the State and political subdivisions of the State absent from work as the result of a work-related injury or disease Singleton v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 2018 NY Slip Op 03411, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe employee in this action, Charles Singleton, was injured on the job and was placed on leave pursuant to §71 of the… [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The statutory rights of employees of the State and political subdivisions of the State absent from work as the result of a work-related injury or disease Singleton v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 2018 NY Slip Op 03411, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe employee in this action, Charles Singleton, was injured on the job and was placed on leave pursuant to §71 of the… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
Although the family was in the process of relocating, the district court found that any consent to the children’s removal to New York, on the part of the father, was conditioned on the family living together in New York. [read post]
The Slayer Rule: A Standard Part of State Inheritance Laws In some ways, the granddaddy of the slayer cases was an old and famous New York case, Riggs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
“[A]s with the case of the travel ban,” the New York Times reported, “the reality of a vastly complicated bureaucratic system is colliding head-on with Mr. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 8:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The evident purpose of the statutory provision, as expressed in the reports of the Bennett Commission on the Law of Estates, was "to place the adopted child for inheritance purposes in the bloodstream of his new family just as a natural child, and sever insofar as possible all connection with the natural family" (Second Report of Temporary State Commn on Modernization, Revision and Simplification of Law of Estates, 1963 N.Y.Legis.Doc., No. 19, at 25,… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
JASSIN is a New York publishing and entertainment attorney with a special interest in copyright and trademark matters. [read post]