Search for: "Matter of Christopher H. v Lisa H." Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Dr Lisa Pryor, an author and journalist,  has settled her defamation case against The Australian Financial Review and former Labor leader Mark Latham. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by Mandelman
The latest decisions from our nation’s courts, including the Massachusetts Supreme Court “Ibanez” decision, Kemp v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Substantive versus Procedural Theories of Private Judging Christopher R. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
(“No serious congressional scholar believes that Congress speaks clearly when addressing major questions as a descriptive matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The new rules do not apply to disclosures regarding health and welfare benefit plans, which the DOL believes to be a more challenging matter that requires further study. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Everett, MA; Alexsandro De Siqueira, President) Ali H Goli Md P.c. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, February 25, 2010 In accordance with the requirements of section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a Settlement Agreement under sections 104, 106(a), 107, and 122 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604, 9606(a), 9607, and 9622, between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Colorado Bumper… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]