Search for: "Matter of City of New York (Glantz)"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek &… [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
City of New York, 302 AD2d 183, 186-89 [1st Dept 2002].) [read post]
