Search for: "Matter of Community Network Service, Inc. v New York State Department of Public Service" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 2:15 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITAdministrative Law City's Denial of Public Pay Telephone Franchise Within 'Safe Harbor' Provisions of TCA §253(c) Global Network Communications Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The dissent also noted that the statute banned access to LinkedIn, Instagram, Reddit, Myspace, and the New York Times Web site. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In 2014, courts in New York, Florida, and California all recognized that U.S. common law copyright provides a performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The dissent also noted that the statute banned access to LinkedIn, Instagram, Reddit, Myspace, and the New York Times Web site. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
Most famously, in Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  As the UK government has explained, DRIPA “makes clear that anyone providing a communications service to customers in the UK – regardless of where that service is provided from – should comply with lawful requests” for production.[17]  In other words, the UK’s laws compelling production turn not on the location of stored data, but on something more like the U.S. legal standard for asserting personal jurisdiction over the custodian… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Antitrust arguments against the big networks are perennially bandied about (see, for example this New York Times Opinion piece), but they have rarely gotten any traction in court. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]