Search for: "Matter of Comstock" Results 21 - 40 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 9:05 am by Paul M. Adkins
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:05 am by Paul M. Adkins
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh and Geoffrey Stone
The New York Tribune observed that “at last birth control — that matter about which men, and especially women, have thought so much and have dared talk so little and then furtively — is to be brought out into the open. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Comstock, the Supreme Court invoked the long standing “choice of means” doctrine when it interpreted a federal criminal statute through the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Thomas Kerner
Such language suggests application of the business judgment rule, a matter of common law in North Carolina, to limited liability companies. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Thomas Kerner
Such language suggests application of the business judgment rule, a matter of common law in North Carolina, to limited liability companies. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Thomas Kerner
Such language suggests application of the business judgment rule, a matter of common law in North Carolina, to limited liability companies. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
Comstock, upholding a federal statute authorizing civil detention of certain federal prisoners after they have completed their sentences. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, writing on a blank slate I might say that stare decisis in statutory cases ought to be as strong as in constitutional cases but not much stronger.That's all as a general matter. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:27 pm
Comstock, 2007 WL 2588815 (E.D.N.C.), was brought to my attention by a friend, who believed it had received insufficient attention in the press. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Comstock, with Justices Thomas and Scalia dissenting, and Justices Kennedy and Alito concurring in the judgment. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:08 am by Orin Kerr
  2) I don’t find myself persuaded by Ilya’s reading of Comstock. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am by Eugene Volokh
That should be a matter left to the states. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:20 pm by Orin Kerr
Comstock: If it can be seen that the means adopted are really calculated to attain the end, the degree of their necessity, the extent to which they conduce to the end, the closeness of the relationship between the means adopted and the end to be attained, are matters for congressional determination alone. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:44 pm by Neil Siegel
That was true in Comstock as well. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm by Ilya Somin
  Be that as it may, what matters in Comstock (or any case) is not what the litigants say, but what the Court decides. [read post]