Search for: "Matter of Confidentiality of Adoption Rec."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2016, 8:38 am
Just recently, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)3 on human rights and business, a text that provides more specific guidance to assist member States in preventing and remedying human rights violations by business enterprises and to induce business to respect human rights. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
Rec. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm
In this regard, the Grand Chamber judgment refers to the EU Directive (2019/1937) of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law and the Recommentation (CM/Rec(2014)7) on the protection of whistle-blowers adopted by the Committee of Minister of the Council of Europe on 30 April 2014 (see also here). [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
In 2002, the Committee of Ministers adopted a detailed “Recommendation on Access to Official Documents” (Rec(2002)002) which invoked Articles 8 and 10 and recommended that “Member States should guarantee the right of everyone to have access, on request, to official documents. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In 2002, the Committee of Ministers adopted a detailed “Recommendation on Access to Official Documents” (Rec(2002)002) which invoked Articles 8 and 10 and recommended that “Member States should guarantee the right of everyone to have access, on request, to official documents. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
(Cong Rec. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
To no one's surprise, it is not uncommon among those deeply within the paradigmatic narrative of global human rights to aggressive adopt the narrative of international legalization and human rights--but operationalized through compliant states. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
Haddon set a hearing for March 29 at 11 a.m. in Great Falls to determine what should be done about the matter. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
In other words, even if the FDA had ignored E.O. 13132 altogether - which the courts that actually bothered to examine the FDA's actions before adopting the Preemption Preamble have concluded it did not - it's not any plaintiff's business.Our second reaction to plaintiffs' arguments about E.O. 13132 is to remind them to quote the darn thing in full. [read post]
