Search for: "Matter of Conti"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
And Conti being Conti, they'd try to get the Supreme Court interested in that question. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
The Fifth Circuit panel only had Conti's federal antitrust claims before it, and that's yet another reason why it doesn't matter whether the Supreme Court sets a low bar for the standing of those claiming to have contractual rights.Let's recall the final sentence of Judge Lynn's dismissal of Conti's complaint:"Given that all of Plaintiff’s federal question claims have been dismissed, the Court declines to exercise supplemental… [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
Conti (2004) conducted two studies to determine whether jurors stereotype criminal offenders as having facial hair... [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:39 pm
It's pretty clear that Conti is hell-bent to exhaust all appeals, so we'll probably see them file a cert petition with the Supreme Court in a matter of months...Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:19 pm
If one looks at the whole picture, Conti's complaint is utterly deficient as a matter of law, and even if--in an alternative universe--they got discovery, Conti could never establish any wrongdoing here.Conti and its counsel should be grateful to the Fifth Circuit not imposing abuse-of-procedure sanctions.While Conti is living in the past and appears unwilling to recognize its error, things are moving fast in the real world. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
Does it matter what happens upstream? [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
As such, the court in this Conti case stated that, since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had not abrogated the reasoning set forth in the Williams case, the decision and law of the Williams case was found to be controlling in this matter. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 1:45 am
If they ever were to sue Conti, Conti could raise all sorts of defenses. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm
For example, Conti had pointed to the location of Apple witnesses, but ultimately named none.What has been a structural problem all along (especially in the antisuit context) is Conti's extremely compex corporate structure. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
In a December 18, 2013 ruling, Judge Samuel Conti denied the defendants’ motion for a new trial or for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict of patent infringement against them, and granted in part the plaintiff’s motion for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees (in light of the jury’s finding of willful infringement) and for a permanent injunction. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:31 am
Judges have to be aggressive in making sure discovery is used only for the matter at hand. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
[COMMENT] That final paragraph of the order suggests that even if Conti had gone to extreme lengths to provide an affidavit on the facts requiring a TRO without a hearing, Judge Koh would almost certainly have denied the motion because this is a complex matter that she's not going to decide in violation of the principle of audiatur et altera pars.An antisuit order is an extraordinary remedy, and an ex parte (= without hearing the other side) TRO is no less extraordinary. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 7:12 am
In September, a writ was filed in the Louisiana Supreme Court in this matter, which is still pending as of November 11, 2022. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:27 am
Downey later visited the estate of Domaine de la Romanee-Conti. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:17 am
Feinstein (The Wharton School), Peter Conti-Brown (The Wharton School), and Kaleb Nygaard (Yale University), on Tuesday, March 8, 2022 Editor's Note: Brian D. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:01 am
Compassion enables us to care about other people and to see matters from their perspective. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:16 pm
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
What matters here is not the date of the motion, but the date of the filing of the original complaint. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Evidently, Judge Conti thought that the alleged misrepresentation did not affect the soda's price and thus caused no harm as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:10 am
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Patent Litigation, 2-12-mc-00244 (PAWD October 25, 2013, Order) (Conti, J.) [read post]
