Search for: "Matter of Daniel P. v Danielle W." Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
To conceal the hush money payment, it was agreed that Cohen would make the payment to Daniels via a shell company (Essential Consultants), on the agreement that Trump would later reimburse Cohen. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The court found that the defendant’s allegations were substantially true and that she had a genuine, reasonable belief that the matter was in the public interest. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramsey: do it w/broad fair use/general rules. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In January 1952, a former collector of internal revenue for the District of Massachusetts, Denis W. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
[w]ho are we to say whether government action has an ‘objective’ impact on religious observance or merely ‘diminishes [a worshipper’s] subjective spiritual fulfillment’”? [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]