Search for: "Matter of Danielson" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
The court held that VA benefits, for a wartime service-related disability, as a matter of statutory construction, did not derive from an act that was "similar to" the SSA or RRA, which were both federal insurance programs based upon employment and the amount of an award under their terms depended upon how much had been paid in. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Gideon
But there’s more dire stuff: the only three operational drug courts in CT: New Haven, Bridgeport and Danielson will close. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:59 am by Jeff Gamso
  An abuse of discretion is, the courts say, a matter of whether the decision was arbitrary or irrational. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 12:34 pm
Walton said the Iowa County Attorney Association “pushed” in 2006 for the repeal of the 2,000-foot rule, but the matter is “too political” to gain ground. - And that is the problem. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:19 am
They love you, they admire you, they look up to you, they make you feel important and you matter. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
This procedure-substance distinction was important, because matters of procedure (and remedies) are governed by the law of the forum, while matters of substance are governed by a more complex choice-of-law analysis that examines the significance and connection of the action to the forum and the forum's interest in the action. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:57 am
Khalil Danielson NEW YORK COUNTYLegal Profession Informal Retainer Is Void; Plaintiff Compensated For Services Rendered Under Quantum Meruit Goldston v. [read post]
23 Nov 2005, 12:46 am
Attorney Kevin Danielson of Tulsa argued the context of the law shows it applies only to proceedings in federal court, not state clemency hearings.He cited a 1994 decision by the appellate judges that said "federal courts should not be required as a routine matter to fulfill the state's obligation to provide an adequate and effective" appeal for indigent criminal defendants. [read post]