Search for: "Matter of Davis v Church" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Cultural cleansing in the Killing Fields by the Khmer Rouge included devastation suffered by 73 Catholic Churches, 130 cham mosques, and 3369 Buddhist temples, all while the Khmer Rouge held a seat at the UN. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 11 August 2017, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the libel case of Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB). [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
These matters were the subject of some media comment: the BBC questioned what the issues are in Fox’s Sky deal, while the Daily Mail reported the delay of Murdoch’s Sky bid. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Stapleton, the court held that a pension plan maintained by a church-affiliated group qualifies for ERISA’s church plan exemption no matter who established the plan. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a piece entitled “Trump, fake news, and shrinking newsrooms: does journalism still matter in 2017? [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Plaintiff submits that the matter before the Court is a case of first impression in the State of New York. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Rollins, a pending cert petition involving the scope of ERISA’s exemption for church health plans. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:14 am by SHG
The Supreme Court opinion these stains-upon-humanity birthed, Snyder v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’ Cameron would usually come to Paylor's house on Saturdays after male choral practice at church. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The simplest approach in concept probably would be to remove or override domestic legal prohibitions on disclosure, where desired, in response to certain types of favored foreign production directives.[37]  As a matter of U.S. law, this would not be difficult technically (although it might be very challenging politically). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]