Search for: "Matter of Davis v Williams"
Results 201 - 220
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
That will be a matter for the assessment of the judge in the individual case. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Int’l v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
The Eleventh Circuit in Troy Anthony Davis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:39 pm
Davis, (U.S. 1976); WMX Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
First is the matter of overturning Citizens United. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
” [via Lexisone] Donald William Dufour v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Strategy is important in law school, just as it is in the real world, and what matters most is how—not just how much—time is spent. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
In Buck v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
(Daniels v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Drawing on and quoting from Printz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Id. at 158; Davis v. [read post]
