Search for: "Matter of Davis-Taylor v Davis-Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2012, 6:32 pm by Mark Summerfield
  How this can come about – and the fact that it is not merely some hypothetical concern of overly-conservative practitioners – is amply demonstrated by a recent case decided in the Queen’s Bench Division of the England and Wales High Court: Ford & Warren v Warring-Davies [2012] EWHC 3523 (QB) (12 December 2012).Read more » [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:48 pm
In our view, the illegality of the sentence was in directing the one-year definite sentence for driving while intoxicated to run consecutively to the one-year concurrent definite sentences for vehicular assault (see People v Davis, 12 AD3d 237, 238). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 The Court reversed its prior position on this matter taken under Chief Justice Taylor. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter for further proceedings.State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
Of most significance to these appeals is the Court of Appeal decision in Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194) (‘Novo’) Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194 (18 March 2013) (bailii.org). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
The matter of leaving the state is a curious one. [read post]