Search for: "Matter of Dillon" Results 81 - 100 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2020, 8:21 am
Dillon of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven until April 30, 2020. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
Dillon of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven until April 30, 2020. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 11:37 am by Ron Friedmann
Lucy Dillon, Mary Abraham, Oz Benamram, and I organize the meeting each year. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:23 pm by Ron Friedmann
I have co-organized it with Lucy Dillon, Mary Abraham, and Oz Benamram for 15+ years. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am by SHG
But since it took Virginia almost half a century to ratify the ERA, does it matter? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Dean Amar noted in his column, in the 1921 case of Dillon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Court Debates Using Shell Companies to Mask Political Donations Bloomberg Law – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 1/10/2020 A federal appeals court panel heard arguments over the use of shell companies to hide donations in a case that could affect super PAC disclosure in the 2020 election. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Before joining the DEA, Dillon was director of the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:59 am by Jeff Welty
Trial judge’s denial of defendant’s request to replace appointed counsel with retained counsel was structural error where trial judge analyzed the issue as a matter of effective assistance rather than the defendant’s right to the counsel of his choice. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
 Begin perhaps with the collection Walking the Clouds look at the work of Grace Dillon (Anishinaabe) The work of Professor Aaron Mills who is working in Anishinaabe Constitutionalism at McGill University may be an interesting pairing. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The Nebraska Supreme Court took the same view: "A jury has yet to determine whether Sullivan's allegations about Dillon and his business practices are false or misleading representations of fact. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Therefore, the determination should be confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed on the merits.SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.ENTER:Aprilanne AgostinoClerk of the Court [read post]