Search for: "Matter of Duffield"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Accordingly it was withdrawn from the scheme, with the result that three of the objectors decided not to pursue the matter [3]. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
A factor in the court’s analysis was that the letter expressly referenced the possibility of litigation if the matter were not resolved. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
A factor in the court’s analysis was that the letter expressly referenced the possibility of litigation if the matter were not resolved. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
One matter of concern in this case was the proposal to level the floor of the Cowper Chapel in order to create an even floor for the proposed meeting room. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
With regard to the first Duffield question, Murray Dep. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
She therefore confined herself to the second question within the Duffield test. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:07 am
In those circumstances the ‘Duffield’ test is much trickier. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The evidence and objections were reviewed again the Duffield questions [21] to [62]. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam. 158, at [87]. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:22 am
…in all the circumstances, including importantly, the matters of the expense of running the underfloor heating that is currently installed, I approve the proposals. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:44 am
This provision does not apply to Chancellors but, it has also been held that, if it had done, it Chancellors would have added nothing to the existing duty and practice of In reaching my decision/ I have had due regard to the role of the church as a local centre of worship and mission, a matter which must be highly relevant to a case of this kind. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:51 am
In cases of doubt the matter must be referred to the bishop and the minister must obey his order and direction: see Canon B 38, paragraph 6. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Since then, we have posted a detailed analysis of the judgment: the first part which was posted on 29 August; the second, including extracts from the conclusions to the Duffield questions on 5 September; and the final part, which considers the overall impact of the proposal and the court’s conclusions, on 7 September. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 12:38 am
The second part includes extracts from the conclusions to the Duffield questions regarding some of the major components of the petition. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Historic England (HE): did not object, subject to certain matters being given more detailed consideration; 19.3. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am
It therefore fell to the Court to determine the matter, taking the letter into account. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
In his review of the case law, Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1; Re Jesus College Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 1; and In the Matter of Dorchester, St Peter, Holy Trinity and All Saints, [2022] ECC Sal 4, Gau Ch observed that it was clear from the diversity of decisions in these cases that any grant of a faculty was fact-specific; the test that he had to apply is set out in Re St Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 together… [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
On assessing whether he should give the matters Mr Cooper raises any weight, Gau Ch. said he did not understand most of the objections, some of them are factually inaccurate, and gave them no weight at all [14]. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The court is bound by the principles set out in Duffield, St Alkmund [2013] Fam 158, but this is not a case where it is suggested that the intended extension would harm the character of this Grade II listed church. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:19 am
” Co-Patron of Policy Exchange’s Biology Matters Project, Rosie Duffield MP stated in the foreward of the report, “it appears the system is rotten to the core. [read post]
