Search for: "Matter of Duffield"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam. 158, at [87]. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am
It therefore fell to the Court to determine the matter, taking the letter into account. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The evidence and objections were reviewed again the Duffield questions [21] to [62]. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
In his review of the case law, Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1; Re Jesus College Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 1; and In the Matter of Dorchester, St Peter, Holy Trinity and All Saints, [2022] ECC Sal 4, Gau Ch observed that it was clear from the diversity of decisions in these cases that any grant of a faculty was fact-specific; the test that he had to apply is set out in Re St Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 together… [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
Duffield (Mich. 1972). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
However, if he were going off for a drink or two and a good argument with his students after the lecture, he thinks the Duffield and Suthersanen would be his choice. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:16 am
In applying the Duffield guidelines, Arlow Ch considered whether the proposals would result in harm to the special significance of the building, and how serious would that harm be [41] to [44]. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
Jurist’s Paper Chase blog also covers the opinion; another look comes from Todd Duffield and Hera Arson at OgletreeDeakins’ eponymous blog. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Since then, we have posted a detailed analysis of the judgment: the first part which was posted on 29 August; the second, including extracts from the conclusions to the Duffield questions on 5 September; and the final part, which considers the overall impact of the proposal and the court’s conclusions, on 7 September. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 12:45 am
The petitioners analyzed their own petition on the basis of the Duffield criteria [5], although the Chancellor noted that it was doubtful that they would be considered entirely independent in doing so. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:51 am
In cases of doubt the matter must be referred to the bishop and the minister must obey his order and direction: see Canon B 38, paragraph 6. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
Burial Act 1853 (Final) Order prohibiting further burials in: St John the Evangelist Church Churchyard, Goldenhill, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire; St Michael’s Churchyard, Stoke Gifford; St Alkmund’s Churchyard, Duffield, Derbyshire; Saint Nicolas Church Churchyard, Kings Norton, Birmingham, West Midlands; St Thomas Churchyard, Rotherham, South Yorkshire. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
However, in his judgment there was no need as such for chairs to be in a particular colour, which was a matter determined by aesthetic considerations [29]. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158, [23] to [50]. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:30 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
One matter of concern in this case was the proposal to level the floor of the Cowper Chapel in order to create an even floor for the proposed meeting room. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The court is bound by the principles set out in Duffield, St Alkmund [2013] Fam 158, but this is not a case where it is suggested that the intended extension would harm the character of this Grade II listed church. [read post]
