Search for: "Matter of Espinoza" Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 9:06 am by Rick Garnett
cert. petitions in Vermont and Maine cases raising the matter, with... [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As the opinion noted:  "It is uncontested that, as a matter of law, Espinoza has stated a proper shareholder purpose under Section 220 —to investigate possible wrongdoing. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:21 am by immigrationprof
Juan Pierre Espinoza (Stetson) has a new immigration article on the Social Science Research Network (www.ssrn.com) "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Removal Proceedings: `Matter of Compean and the Fundamental Fairness Doctrine'" It will has been published in the “Florida Journal... [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:48 am
The Board of Immigration Appeals has just ruled in Matter of Lael MARTINEZ ESPINOZA, 25 I&N Dec. 118 (BIA 2009) that: (1) An alien may be rendered inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court, which heard arguments on the merits in January in the case, Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:22 pm
Daniel Espinoza has accepted responsibility for his actions in pleading no contest to the charge. [read post]
Reina also stated that the Honduran Embassy is in contact with Espinoza’s family and is investigating the matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Put another way, so long as the effect is the same, how can the cause matter? [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Zapata Espinoza, who is being held without bond, appeared in U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Russell Cawyer
The San Antonio Court of Appeals reversed the judgment for Espinoza and held that since CTOP's alleged failure to pay Espinoza did not grow out of the obligations outlined in the Noncompetition Agreement, the alleged breaches of the separate Compensation Agreement could not, as a matter of law, constitute an unclean hands defense to the noncompetition agreement. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
The Board of Immigration Appeals has just ruled in Matter of Lael MARTINEZ ESPINOZA, 25 I&N Dec. 118 (BIA 2009) that: (1) An alien may be rendered inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]