Search for: "Matter of Farkas v Farkas"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
Yesterday's decision by the First Department in Farkas v Farkas, 2007 NY Slip Op 03762 should be a strong wake up call to all attorneys to strictly comply with all time frames in which to take a procedural step in litigation. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Farkas contends that Wells Fargo is not the mortgagee because "[t]he purported assignment of the Deed of Trust is ineffective to transfer the security interest to Wells Fargo as a matter of law" because "Wells Fargo does not hold the subject debt." [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:47 am
The initial burden of proving that a party's medical condition is in controversy is on the party seeking the information, and it is only after such an evidentiary showing that discovery may proceed.Case: Farkas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Such was not a determination on the merits and thus res judicata does not apply to bar commencement of another action based on the same transactions (see Sclafani v Story Book Homes, 294 AD2d 559; Matter of Farkas v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
" CIVIL PROCEDURE, FAMILY LAW, JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT Farkas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
It is acknowledged that there may well be effects from backlogs in specific subject-matters associated with these delays. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:10 am
Ontario’s courts and tribunals were busy this past year with condominium matters. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The bonds in both the Jacobson and Nine Thirty FEF matters contain riders which provide that they will cover loss resulting directly from the dishonest acts of any Outside Investment Advisor na [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am
” (New York Univ. v Farkas, 121 Misc 2d 643, 646 [Civ Ct, NY County 1983].) [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
