Search for: "Matter of Ferris" Results 41 - 60 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
The agreement further provided that it was "executed in consideration of the Department's resolution of the aforementioned charge without the furtherance of disciplinary action in this matter. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
On the other hand, in this matter, Officer Milan stated at the suppression hearing that Defendant was on the Ferry when he observed the bag in question and that there was no indication that Defendant was leaving the Ferry or intended to stay in St. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:22 pm by Michael Lebowich and Joshua Fox
No. 13770(1) (Executive branch employees are prohibited from “participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to [a] former employer . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:53 am by James Nicholas
It also offers a scathing rebuke of the Obama-era Board’s much-maligned 2015 decision: “We find that the Browning-Ferris standard is a distortion of common law as interpreted by the Board and the courts, it is contrary to the Act, it is ill-advised as a matter of policy, and its application would prevent the Board from discharging one of its primary responsibilities under the Act, which is to foster stability in labor-management relations. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 6:56 pm
  The Supreme Court held as a matter of law that it did not, and that secondary impacts should have been considered. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Alexander S. Radus
The decision significantly expanded franchisors’ potential liability for matters related to their franchisees’ employees (including collective bargaining and employment torts). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
In the Hy-Brand case, the Trump Board overruled Browning-Ferris in a lengthy opinion articulating why the 2015 decision was legally infirm and unwise as a matter of policy—largely tracing the reasoning of Member Miscimarra’s Browning-Ferris dissent. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Michael Schmidt
The present matter no longer involves a claim of potential misconduct. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 5:35 pm
” Interestingly, the DOL ruled that it did not matter whether the drug tests were on duty or off duty. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:55 pm
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., an AmLaw 100 firm with offices in the U.S. and U.K., continues to expand its West Coast office, located in Palo Alto. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:30 am by Chris Williams
Sometimes family matters are more important than billables. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Stymied in its efforts to undo its Obama-era Browning-Ferris decision, which expanded the definition of “joint employer” and thereby increased potential liability under the NLRA for companies that utilize contingent workforce and franchise arrangements, the NLRB on May 9 announced it was considering resolving the matter through issuance of a proposed rule. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:37 pm by Keahn Morris, Mark Ross and Garen Dodge
Yesterday, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) overruled Browning-Ferris Industries, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (“BFI”) and returned to the pre-BFI standard that governed joint employer liability. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
As a matter of fact, in the Ferris case, decedent in that circumstance died in the home of her nephew in St. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:10 am by Micah T. Saul
The Browning-Ferris decision was appealed, and the appeal is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]