Search for: "Matter of Figueroa v Figueroa" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
The rest of the explanation comes from the applicable six-year statute of limitations (CPLR 213[1]) under which, as the Appellate Division held in 1996 in DiPace v Figueroa, the six years runs from the “instances of alleged wrongdoing adverted to by [the petitioner] as grounds for dissolution. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am by Russell Knight
Figueroa, 719 NE 2d 108 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 5th Div. 1999 There are three types of cross-examination: 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm by Cannabis Law Group
What makes the Figueroa case so noteworthy is that it’s the first time such a matter has made it to a federal appellate court. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Canada (Attorney General) in 1993, and Sauvé v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
McFadden of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Figueroa v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
McFadden of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Figueroa v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Harm or prejudice is proper when the party’s actions “were calculated to, or actually did defeat, impair, impede or prejudice the rights and remedies of the other party (Figueroa-Rolon v Torres 121 AD3d 684). [read post]