Search for: "Matter of Gardner v Gardner" Results 1 - 20 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Charon QC
  The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s  extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:49 am by Venkat Balasubramani
shutterstock / Sarawut Aiemsinsuk – “monkey” Gardner is a wildlife photographer. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:24 am by sally
“Today (27 October) I am talking to ex-government lawyer Carl Gardner about the ‘Votes for Prisoners’ issue and two key cases on the matter United Kingdom v Hirst and the Frodl decision. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
However, Moshlak may not present his opinion in the matter phrased in his report. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:55 am by jrvann
In the recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Gardner v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:45 am by charonqc
” Today I am talking to ex-government lawyer Carl Gardner about the ‘Votes for Prisoners’ issue and two key cases on the matter United Kingdom v Hirst and the Frodl decision Listen to the podcast I covered this issue in a guest post by John Hirst – which generated a lively discussion. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or a… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:02 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or a… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:02 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or a… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, the Appellate Division confirmed a decision of the New York State Comptroller denying a member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System application for accidental disability retirement [ADR] benefits, explaining that an applicant for ADR bears the burden of showing that his or her "incapacitation from the performance of his [or her] duties was the natural and proximate result of an accident or a… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
    "This matter involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Robert and Carmela Gardner, and their son, the defendant James Gardner, over the ownership of the corporate plaintiff, CJEFA Pizza, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner was typically quick and right on Twitter yesterday to draw our attention to the relevant cases: Praha v Czech Republic, and Otto v Germany, neither of which is specifically about this three-month period but rather the six-month time limit for bringing your claim to the ECtHR in the first place. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Charon QC
Prisoner Votes… Carl Gardner, writing at his Head of Legal blog, considers the current position on the right of prisoners to vote in a most useful analysis of the UK Supreme Court judgment: R (Chester) v Justice Secretary, McGeoch v Lord President. [read post]