Search for: "Matter of Gill" Results 61 - 80 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 12:35 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Gill is only available this afternoon and the government would like him on the stand. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:17 pm
That's the title of James Gill's column in today's New Orleans Times-Picayune. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:29 pm by Kenneth Anderson
This follows on my post on AA Gill and Mark Steyn which, I see, got a citation on Steyn’s website as “reader of the day. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:12 pm by JB
(By the way, the Justice Department, to my knowledge, has not yet decided whether to appeal Gill. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm by JB
Today Judge Joseph Tauro in the federal district court in Massachusetts struck down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in two opinions, Gill v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 3:17 am by Donald Dinnie
This UK court of appeal judgment Lord Bishop of Leeds v Dixon Coles & Gill [2021] EWCA Civ 1211 considered whether claims arising from one series of related acts or omissions could be aggregated. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 am by Stefanie Levine
Jeanne Gills, Partner at Foley & Lardner and Practice Center Contributor, along with colleagues Courtenay C. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:40 am by Stefanie Levine
As a practical matter, an applicant only has one opportunity to introduce new evidence as a matter of right, and that comes very early in prosecution, after the first Office Action on the merits. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:40 am by Stefanie Levine
As a practical matter, an applicant only has one opportunity to introduce new evidence as a matter of right, and that comes very early in prosecution, after the first Office Action on the merits. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:49 pm by David Kopel
No matter how much they might like the result in this particular case, this is not a road that liberals want to travel. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:10 am
The Jawa Report posts what appears to be a copy of the motion: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS AND JUVENILE BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF: FATHIMA RIFQA BARY, AN ALLEGED DEPENDENT CHILD Case No. 09 JU 11 14895 Judge: GILL Magistrate: GOODRICH MOTION TO ENJOIN COUNSEL FROM PASSING MESSAGES OF THIRD PARTIES DIRECTLY TO THE MINOR CHILD Wherefore, now come Mohamed Bary and Aysha Risana Bary, the parents of Fathima Rifqa Bary, by and through… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am by Stefanie Levine
Jeanne Gills (partner at Foley & Lardner and Practice Center Contributor) and Mary M. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
 An important part of the challenge to DOMA in Gill relies on the proposition that domestic relations are a matter for state law. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
If you are not a lawyer, perhaps you don't know who this Brady was and why his prong matters. [read post]