Search for: "Matter of Gordon v Morris" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
A lively discussion of the English approach to obviousness as applied in the Hospira v Genotech patent revocation application. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Gordon & Ors as Trustees of the Inter Vivos Trust of the late William Strathdee Gordon v Campbell Riddell Breeze Paterson LLP (Scotland), heard 19 Jul 2017. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd, heard 11-12 Oct 2017. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
By citing Charles’s case, Morris was trying to make the general point that guarding against a foreign power corrupting the president was an important matter to address—and the Founders agreed. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under this principle of law, in a trio of decisions, the Second Department has three times reversed lower courts for denying disqualification of litigation counsel in both LLC member and corporate shareholder disputes (see Deerin v Ocean Rich Foods, LLC, 158 AD3d 603 [2d Dept 2018]; Gordon v Obiakor, 117 AD3d 681 [2d Dept 2014]; Morris v Morris, 306 AD2d 449 [2d Dept 2003]). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Declaration of Wesley Morris ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction (“Morris Decl. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]