Search for: "Matter of Hector V."
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 10:42 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0010, 2011 MT 214, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:21 am
COX, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:27 am
(This matters a ton since receipt has a five-year mandatory minimum but possession doesn't.)The first paragraph of Judge O'Scannlain's opinion framed the question as: "As between the prosecutor and the trial judge, who determines which conviction to vacate when a defendant has been convicted of multiplicitous offenses in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause? [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Hector Lewis MacQueen, University of Edinburgh, School of Law, has published Ae Fond Kiss: A Private Matter? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
Hector D Rolen. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
Hector, 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:13 am
This is illustrated in a 2016, Southern District, Houston Division opinion styled, Hector Puente and Teresa Rivera v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
On March 5, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Alvarado v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am
(See, Rubenfeld v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
Segovia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:29 pm
Westrec Marina Management, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:10 am
These atmospherics were important given that Sotomayor has been criticized by lawyers for being overly hectoring on the Second Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
